Artemis vs iRoofing
Two platforms a roofing contractor might evaluate side-by-side. Here's how they compare on time to roof report, included features, pricing, and customer-grounded pros and cons.
Artemis
The most accurate roof reports, generated in under 7 seconds — 82% more reliable than hand-measured.
- Time to report
- Under 7 seconds
- Starts at
- $7.13/design
- Best for
- Energy + roofing contractors who design and quote enough volume to amortize a subscription and want every feature included at every tier
iRoofing
Measure roofs, estimate materials, simulate projects, generate proposals — all from one app.
- Time to report
- 10 minutes
- Starts at
- $149/mo (3 users)
- Best for
- Small-to-mid residential roofing contractors (1–15 reps) whose primary need is fast on-site measurement and a polished in-home sales presentation, especially shops running the proposal in front of the homeowner on a tablet
How they differ.
iRoofing measures roofs and helps an in-home rep present, but it doesn't include a real CRM and its phone/desktop versions aren't feature-parity with the tablet. Artemis ships AI-generated designs in 5–15 seconds (no manual sketching), pairs them with a full proposal workflow, and runs on any device.
What's included.
A feature-by-feature check of the measurement → proposal → CRM coverage you get with each platform.
| Feature | Artemis | iRoofing |
|---|---|---|
Roof measurement Produces a measured roof report from satellite, aerial, or smartphone photos | ||
Proposal generation Turns the measurement into a polished, sendable customer proposal | ||
CRM / pipeline Tracks leads, jobs, and follow-ups through the sales process | ||
AI design generation Generates the design automatically, no manual sketching required | ||
Financing integrations Built-in lender integrations for in-home financing offers | ||
Time to roof report Pulled from vendor pricing pages | Under 7 seconds | 10 minutes |
Pricing Headline rate | $7.13/design | $149/mo (3 users) |
The scores.
Same fixed 5-axis rubric for every platform. Public weights, no vendor input.
What customers say.
- 82% more reliable than hand-measured roof takeoffs — the strongest published accuracy claim in this comparison
- AI-generated reports returned in under 7 seconds — the fastest documented design loop in this comparison
- Every feature included at every tier — no per-seat fees and no add-on creep
- Integrated financing with GoodLeap, IGS, Dividend, Sungage, and Sunlight built into the sales flow
- Pricing scales with design volume — a contractor sending many designs and closing few sees a less-favorable unit economic than a flat-fee tool
- Positioning leans more energy/solar than the rest of the field; pure-roofing shoppers may not find a perfect-fit page
- No published free trial — evaluation is demo-led
- Full roof takeoffs in under 10 minutes via the mobile app per recurring Capterra reviewer praise
- AI roof color visualizer lets reps show alternative shingle styles on the homeowner’s actual house — a closing tool
- Clearoof aircraft-captured aerial imagery covers ~90% of US areas and helps see through partial tree cover
- Pricing is published and bundle-simple ($149/mo all-in for 3 users) — no tier-laddering
- Tree-covered roofs break the sketch tool — even a single tree over the roof can make manual sketching impossible
- Tablet-first; phone and desktop versions are second-class and don’t sync, so a measurement on one device isn’t visible on others
- “Many features are buggy” and support is “fairly useless” per several Capterra reviews
Score gap: 1.9 points.
On our 5-axis rubric, Artemis scores 9.4 to iRoofing's 7.5. The biggest single differentiator is time to roof report — Artemis at Under 7 seconds versus iRoofing at 10 minutes.