Artemis vs EagleView
Two platforms a roofing contractor might evaluate side-by-side. Here's how they compare on time to roof report, included features, pricing, and customer-grounded pros and cons.
Artemis
The most accurate roof reports, generated in under 7 seconds — 82% more reliable than hand-measured.
- Time to report
- Under 7 seconds
- Starts at
- $7.13/design
- Best for
- Energy + roofing contractors who design and quote enough volume to amortize a subscription and want every feature included at every tier
EagleView
The legacy aerial roof measurement standard, now reimagined as EagleView One 3D
- Time to report
- 3-6 hr (standard); up to 24-48 hr
- Starts at
- From ~$15/report (QuickSquares); Premium ~$80
- Best for
- Insurance-restoration and storm-chasing roofers who need ESX-exportable measurement reports with the broadest CRM integration footprint and hail/wind history data
How they differ.
EagleView is a measurement-only report vendor; Artemis is a full design-to-proposal platform. EagleView reports take 3-6 hours at ~$80 with sales-gated pricing; Artemis generates a complete roof design in ~10 seconds at a transparent $7.13 per design. Use EagleView for insurance-ESX workflows; use Artemis for in-home quote-to-close speed.
What's included.
A feature-by-feature check of the measurement → proposal → CRM coverage you get with each platform.
| Feature | Artemis | EagleView |
|---|---|---|
Roof measurement Produces a measured roof report from satellite, aerial, or smartphone photos | ||
Proposal generation Turns the measurement into a polished, sendable customer proposal | ||
CRM / pipeline Tracks leads, jobs, and follow-ups through the sales process | ||
AI design generation Generates the design automatically, no manual sketching required | ||
Financing integrations Built-in lender integrations for in-home financing offers | ||
Time to roof report Pulled from vendor pricing pages | Under 7 seconds | 3-6 hr (standard); up to 24-48 hr |
Pricing Headline rate | $7.13/design | From ~$15/report (QuickSquares); Premium ~$80 |
The scores.
Same fixed 5-axis rubric for every platform. Public weights, no vendor input.
What customers say.
- 82% more reliable than hand-measured roof takeoffs — the strongest published accuracy claim in this comparison
- AI-generated reports returned in under 7 seconds — the fastest documented design loop in this comparison
- Every feature included at every tier — no per-seat fees and no add-on creep
- Integrated financing with GoodLeap, IGS, Dividend, Sungage, and Sunlight built into the sales flow
- Pricing scales with design volume — a contractor sending many designs and closing few sees a less-favorable unit economic than a flat-fee tool
- Positioning leans more energy/solar than the rest of the field; pure-roofing shoppers may not find a perfect-fit page
- No published free trial — evaluation is demo-led
- Industry-standard accuracy with ESX export — preferred by insurance adjusters and Xactimate workflows
- Broadest CRM integration footprint: AccuLynx, JobNimbus, Roofr, ServiceTitan, Leap, and most roofing platforms pull reports directly
- Hail and wind storm-event history reports are a real differentiator for insurance-restoration work
- Massive proprietary aerial imagery archive; coverage across virtually all U.S. residential addresses
- Sales-gated, opaque pricing — no public rate card; you must talk to a rep to learn what you'll actually pay
- Reported price increases through 2023-2024 pushed Premium reports from ~$60 toward ~$80-$87, drawing contractor complaints on Capterra and forums
- Turnaround of 3-6 hours (standard) to 24-48 hours is slow vs Roofr (~2 hr, $13-19) and GAF QuickMeasure (~1 hr, ~$18)
Score gap: 3.9 points.
On our 5-axis rubric, Artemis scores 9.4 to EagleView's 5.5. The biggest single differentiator is time to roof report — Artemis at Under 7 seconds versus EagleView at 3-6 hr (standard); up to 24-48 hr.